5 min read

Why Successful Project Leaders Are Embracing Change and Uncertainty

Why Successful Project Leaders Are Embracing Change and Uncertainty
Photo by NASA Hubble Space Telescope / Unsplash

Most leaders misunderstand the purpose of failing fast. 

This is leading to disasters in the major projects that they are leading within their organizations. This concept of failing fast is being driven out of the Silicon Valley culture of move fast and break things which is driven out of the hacker culture at the genesis of the Silicon Valley movement.

Organizations like Google, Meta, Apple, and others have become so successful that many leaders and organizations are looking to replicate their success by moving fast and breaking things. But the movement and the theory of project management doesn’t always extend, when failure is not an option. This commonly held belief has created some of the most expensive failures in the execution of big transformational projects. 

The Olympic Dream Becomes a Nightmare

The Montreal Olympics, held in 1976, is often cited as a classic case of project planning and management failure, primarily due to its significant cost overruns and delays. Initially estimated to cost around $124 million, the final costs ballooned to over $1.5 billion, leaving the city in debt for decades. One of the major issues was the construction of the Olympic Stadium, which faced numerous setbacks, including labor strikes, technical difficulties, and changes in design that significantly delayed its completion. The stadium was not fully completed in time for the games, and the iconic tower was finished only in the 1980s. The financial disaster of the Montreal Olympics serves as a cautionary tale about the risks of inadequate planning, unrealistic budgeting, and the failure to anticipate challenges in large-scale projects. 

The Missed Notes in Australia

The Sydney Opera House, an architectural marvel and a UNESCO World Heritage site, also represents a significant case of project planning and management failures. Initially estimated to cost $7 million and take four years to build, the project ended up costing over $100 million and took 14 years to complete, from 1959 to 1973. Several factors contributed to these overruns and delays, including changes in government, revisions to the original design, and underestimation of the technical challenges associated with its innovative construction. The architect, Jørn Utzon, eventually resigned due to conflicts over design and budget issues, highlighting the complexities of managing large-scale and unique architectural projects. The Sydney Opera House's history underscores the importance of realistic budgeting, careful planning, and clear communication among all stakeholders in a project. 

A Tech Company Does Tech Wrong

When a company embarks on implementing an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system, it often faces significant project planning challenges that can lead to failures if not managed properly. Common pitfalls include underestimating the complexity and scale of the project, leading to unrealistic timelines and budgets. Many companies fail to fully engage stakeholders across all levels of the organization, resulting in resistance to change and inadequate training that undermines the ERP's effectiveness. Additionally, a lack of clear objectives and insufficient testing before going live can result in disruptions to business operations and unmet user needs. These challenges highlight the necessity for comprehensive planning, including rigorous needs assessment, stakeholder involvement, and contingency planning, to ensure the successful implementation of an ERP system. 


The issue with moving fast and breaking things occurs when you are in a zero fail situation 

Major projects are zero failure situations. It is extremely difficult to change course if as you break things, you find out it didn’t work.

When failure is not an option because lives are at stake, project planning demands an exceptionally rigorous and disciplined approach. The construction of a hospital's emergency response system serves as a poignant example. In this context, the margin for error must be minimized through meticulous planning, extensive stakeholder engagement, and the implementation of redundant safety measures. The project's success hinges on a thorough risk assessment and the development of robust contingency plans to ensure uninterrupted operation under any circumstances.

Studies in critical infrastructure projects underscore the importance of such rigorous planning. For instance, research published in the "International Journal of Project Management" highlights how projects critical to public safety that adopted a highly structured and disciplined planning process significantly reduced risks and enhanced operational reliability. These projects often employ advanced simulation techniques to anticipate potential failures and test responses in a controlled environment, thereby ensuring that every conceivable scenario has been planned for and addressed. 

By adopting a project planning approach where the stakes involve human lives, organizations can achieve a level of operational excellence that not only safeguards against failures but also builds public trust. This methodology entails a deep commitment to quality, safety, and resilience, emphasizing the need for detailed planning, constant vigilance, and the flexibility to adapt to emerging threats. In doing so, the outcome is a system or infrastructure that is not just robust and reliable, but also capable of maintaining critical operations in the face of unforeseen challenges, ensuring that lives are protected at all costs.

Move from rapid shipping to rapid learning

Begin by conducting a comprehensive risk assessment of your project to identify all potential points of failure and their impacts.

This step involves systematically analyzing every aspect of the project, from supply chains to human resources, to technology dependencies. By understanding the risks, you can develop targeted contingency plans for each scenario, ensuring that you are prepared for any eventuality.

Shifting your mindset to prioritize thorough risk assessment and contingency planning will significantly enhance your project's resilience. As a result, you can expect a heightened state of preparedness, where your team is not only aware of potential risks but is also equipped with actionable strategies to mitigate them effectively. This approach reduces downtime, maintains project momentum, and ensures that critical objectives are met, even under adverse conditions.

Moreover, this mindset shift cultivates a culture of proactive problem-solving within your team. Members become more vigilant, innovative, and responsive to changes, knowing that their preparedness can make the difference between success and failure. In the long run, adopting this rigorous planning approach will build your reputation as a reliable and resilient project leader, capable of delivering successful outcomes in the most challenging situations. This resilience becomes a cornerstone of your professional identity, opening up new opportunities for leadership in high-stakes projects and establishing you as a go-to expert in managing complex, critical initiatives where failure is not an option.

Failure isn’t the objective, learning is the objective 

Returning to the outset, the traditional mindset that major projects can proceed under a rigid, failure-is-not-an-option approach is increasingly untenable in today's fast-paced and complex world. The reasons for this shift are clear:

**Complexity and Uncertainty:** Modern projects, whether in construction, technology, or healthcare, operate in environments of unprecedented complexity and uncertainty. The old way, with its inflexibility and linear planning, cannot accommodate the rapid changes and unforeseen challenges that are now commonplace. 

**Technological Advancement:** The pace of technological innovation means that projects need to incorporate new tools and methodologies continuously. The new approach, emphasizing agility and adaptability, leverages these advancements to improve project outcomes.

**Stakeholder Expectations:** Today's stakeholders demand transparency, responsiveness, and sustainability. They are more likely to support projects that demonstrate a commitment to learning from setbacks and adapting strategies in real-time. 

The future of successful project planning and execution, therefore, lies in embracing a mindset that values resilience, flexibility, and continuous improvement. Imagine a future where projects are not only designed to achieve their initial goals but are also resilient enough to adapt and thrive amid disruptions. In this future, project teams are more cohesive and empowered, stakeholders are more engaged and supportive, and projects deliver value not just in their outcomes but in their ability to withstand and adapt to change.

This new way of thinking is not just the future—it's a pressing necessity for anyone looking to lead projects in the 21st century. By adopting this mindset, you position yourself at the forefront of project management, ready to navigate the complexities of modern projects with confidence and skill. The value of being part of this shift is immense, offering the chance to lead projects that are not only successful in traditional terms but are also resilient, adaptive, and innovative, setting new standards for what can be achieved.